Encryption debate rolls on
The San Bernardino court case may be over, but the encryption debate is still very much alive.
The San Bernardino court case may be over, but the encryption debate is still very much alive.
An advance in random number generation? Who cares? What's so important about improving the way we generate random numbers, and how does this tie in with security?
We've recently released CompleteFTP 9.0, and it has many enhancements and fixes that are explained in more detail below.
Last week we reported that the FBI thought that they may be able to unlock the infamous iPhone without the help of Apple. Apparently, they were approached by a third party who had a solution.
It's obvious that the IoT offers us a great deal when it comes to efficient management of our devices, for consumers, government and business. But there are significant reasons for concern, too.
Last year we looked at the United Kingdom’s draft Investigatory Powers Bill (known as the snooper's charter"), and criticized the requirement for vendors to install "back doors" into their software
We wrote recently that Apple has refused the FBI's request to create a new version of the iPhone's operating system.
On 1 March, the UK's Investigatory Powers Bill (or snooper's charter) was introduced to the House of Commons. It will go through the normal parliamentary processes for a bill.
Apple is currently battling the FBI, who wants to force Apple to create a version of iOS that enables it to unlock a domestic terrorist's iPhone.
The UK's parliament is currently debating the Investigatory Powers bill, known as the snoopers' charter.